The Truth About Covid: Part 4
The Era of Trans-Humanism? Faulty PCR Tests Driving The Pandemic Narrative?
Quote from A Bug’s Life everyone needs to familiarize themselves with:
You let one ant stand up to us, then they all might stand up...And if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life...it’s about keeping those ants in line.
This presentation’s purpose is to highlight important scientific developments that suggest public officials are providing factually inaccurate information and don’t have citizens best interests at mind. I have compiled some of the most compelling studies that I have come across and the data provided will justify my statements. I want to shed light on the truth and help better educate individuals on what is truly going on in the world. This mini-series will consist of 5 parts spanning various topics pertaining to Covid.
Introduction:
If you have read parts 1-3 of this series, I assume I’ve garnered your attention. In part 4 of this series, I plan to shed light on the ingredients in the Covid vaccines and how the faulty PCR tests have led to a false pandemic narrative. In order for individuals to make a voluntary informed decision on a medical procedure such as a vaccination, the individual must know the contents of the vaccine. With the likelihood of false positives deriving from the PCR tests, how inflated are case numbers and deaths? Are we really in another wave of the pandemic or has Covid become endemic?
*Warning:
Before questioning the reasons behind an individual deciding not to get the vaccine, read this article and you’ll start to understand why. There are definitive reasons as to why individuals choose to remain unvaccinated. If you have taken the vaccine, I encourage you to pay attention to what I have provided. The contents of this article will make some individuals uneasy because it’s really a cross between a sci-fi novel and horror story. Research and question EVERYTHING but if this article makes you uncomfortable with your decision, please let it serve as a lesson to stop trusting the media, officials, and to stop berating those that wish to have medical autonomy over their bodies. Enjoy.
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual. - Thomas Jefferson
Autopsy of Individual After Receiving One Dose of Pfizer Vaccine:
The first postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against Covid was conducted and published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Results from the autopsy are extremely alarming. The scientists conducted postmortem molecular mapping and found viral RNA in nearly all organs examined. This means the viral RNA from the vaccine, doesn’t remain in the injection site (as suggested from officials), it travels and effects vital organs. They found that immunogenicity might be prevalent (ability of a foreign substance, such as an antigen, to provoke an immune response) but concluded sterile immunity had not been established. Sterile immunity is synonymous with herd immunity, what the experts claim would be a result of mass immunization.
International Journal of Infectious Diseases: First Postmortem Study in a Patient Vaccinated Against SARS-CoV-2
Findings of the study include:
Acute bilateral bronchopneumonia with abscess surrounded by bacteria. There were no findings of the usually described manifestations of COVID-19 pneumonitis. Both sides of the heart were enlarged and diagnosed with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Amyloidosis of the heart and the lungs. The kidneys showed chronic damage with acute renal failure.
Viral RNA was demonstrated in nearly all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney, and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb.
Sterile immunity: means an immune response can stop viral replication. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in different organs showed that nothing stopped the SARS-CoV-2 from replicating.
The results of this study should alarm individuals that have made the decision to get vaccinated. Autopsy results show the vast damage viral RNA can cause in vital organs which can ultimately lead to death. These are the kinds of things the unvaccinated are cautious about, especially considering the long term effects of this experimental vaccine have yet to be determined.
What’s Actually in Covid Vaccines?
A question that has surfaced from the mass Covid vaccine immunization initiative has been “what’s actually in the vaccine?” Vaccines that use synthetic mRNA as the basis of protection, have never been done before on a mass scale. The fact that the vaccines that have been distributed for Covid have never been done before, should be enough to prompt individuals to look into the potential side effects and actual ingredients in said vaccines. One of the ingredients that draws concern are spike proteins and the “safety” of injecting individuals with spike proteins. Spike proteins are pathogenic proteins, as well as a toxin. Another ingredient of concern is the use of modified (synthetic) mRNA technology. The use of modified mRNA has created a debate within the science and medical communities due to the unknown effects on individuals that have been injected with synthetic genetic material. The use of graphene oxide in the vaccines has also drawn major concern due to its electromagnetic properties and that it’s a toxin, which can trigger thrombi and blood coagulation. Graphene Oxide, most notably used in electronics, in the creation of artificial intelligence, and is known to be responsive to radio frequencies. The combination of synthetic mRNA and graphene oxide in these vaccines, straddle the lines of trans-humanism.
A report analyzed the contents of the Pfizer vaccine; from the ingredients, effectiveness, how it was evaluated, and safety. The report sheds light on many unanswered questions that pertain to the safety and efficacy of these experimental mRNA vaccines. The conclusions of the report indicate there are too many causes for concern and lack the data to support claims about the Covid vaccines being “safe.”
What You Need to Know About Pfizer’s Covid Vaccine:
Ingredient of concern: Modified mRNA.
…there are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions. An article published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a division of the National Institutes of Health, said other risks include the bio-distribution and persistence of the induced immunogen expression; possible development of auto-reactive antibodies; and toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.
Ingredient of concern: Polyethylene Glycol (PEG).
Polyethylene glycol is one of the ingredients used for the lipid nanoparticle that protects the mRNA sequence. [Polyethylene glycol, or PEG] has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis—a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat.
Dr. Robert Young, a Biochemist, Microbiologist and Clinical Nutritionist conducted a study to identify specific ingredients in the mRNA Covid vaccines that have been forced onto society. The study used instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to nano-particulate technological approaches (various microscopic imagery techniques), to determine the composition of the vaccines. He and his team confirmed that the vaccines contain toxic nano-metallic content, which are magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plants, insects, birds, animals and humans. Thus toxic to all living organisms.
American Scientists Confirm Toxic Graphene Oxide, and More in Covid Injections:
Liposome capsids are fatty lipid capsules. We are told their purpose is to envelope the mRNA to protect the genetic material from breaking down before it has reached its target – our body’s cells. All four Covid “vaccines” contain relatively high levels of graphene oxide but both the Pfizer and Moderna liposome capsids are 100% graphene oxide (after extracting the mRNA). Graphene oxide is cytotoxic, genotoxic, and magneticotoxic. The liposome delivers the graphene oxide to specific organs, glands and tissues, namely: the ovaries and testes; bone marrow; heart; and, brain.
In the AstraZeneca “vaccines,” Dr. Young and his team identified histidine, sucrose, poly-ethylene glycol (“PEG”) and ethylene alcohol, which were also contained in the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen Covid injections. PEG was the only adjuvant declared on the data sheet listing the ingredients of the AstraZeneca injection. The injection of PEG and ethylene alcohol are both known to be carcinogenic and genotoxic.
Janssen also contains particles which are composed of stainless steel which are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide.
The Moderna “vaccine” also contains many spherical foreign bodies with some bubble-shaped cavities. These highly toxic nano particulate composition are quantum dots of cadmium selenide which are cytotoxic and genotoxic. Quantum dots are semiconductor nanoparticles that glow a particular colour after being illuminated by light.
A study published in 2016, looked at the toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles in relation to biomedical applications. The study focused on the delivery, dosage, toxicity, and overall function of graphene oxide for various biomedical applications. This study concludes that graphene oxide can cause damage in physiological barriers such as the blood brain barrier and blood placenta barrier. Researchers saw damage in all internal organ systems that ranged from Central Nervous System damage to structural DNA damage. They also saw the occurrence of apoptosis (self-destruction of a cell regulated by genes) and necrosis (alternative form of cell death induced by inflammatory response or cellular injury) in the cells of various systems throughout the body.
Particle & Fibre Toxicology: Toxicity of Graphene-Family Nanoparticles: A General Overview of the Origins & Mechanisms
GFNs penetrate through the physiological barriers or cellular structures by different exposure ways or administration routes and entry the body or cells, eventually resulting in toxicity in vivo and in vitro. The varying administration routes and entry paths, different tissue distribution and excretion, even the various cell uptake patterns and locations, may determine the degree of the toxicity of GFNs.
Many experiments have shown that GFNs have toxic side effects in many biological applications, but the in-depth study of toxicity mechanisms is urgently needed. In addition, contrasting results regarding the toxicity of GFNs need to be addressed by effective experimental methods and systematic studies. This review provides an overview of the toxicity of GFNs by summarizing the toxicokinetics, toxicity mechanisms and influencing factors and aimed to provide information to facilitate thorough research on the in vitro and in vivo haemo and biocompatibility of GFNs in the future.
In December of 2020, J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D, sent a public notice to the FDA about the potential risks of the Covid vaccines. Whelan a holds degrees in Biochemistry, Medicine & Rheumatology and serves as a Pediatric Rheumatologist. Whelan’s notice was to alert the FDA about the possibility of vaccines designed to create immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, instead could cause injuries.
A leaked Pfizer document that was included in a major federal lawsuit (included in part 5) shows the nanoparticle distribution of spike proteins in various organ systems. One organ system that showed high lipid concentration, were the ovaries. This is an alarming issue because this suggests the possibility of fertility issues and damage in the female reproductive system. Lawsuit will be discussed in part 5, excerpt from page 13.
A leaked Pfizer document (excerpted below) exposes that Pfizer Vaccine nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries at an extraordinarily high rate, in concentrations orders of magnitude higher than in other tissues. Billions of aggressive spike proteins are accumulating in very delicate ovarian tissues, the one place in the human body where females carry a finite number of fertile eggs.
A study from 2005 examined spike proteins in the SARS(1) vaccine, which provided protection against one strain but worsened infection from other strains. This study was conducted after another study from 2005, concluded that the vaccines for SARS-CoV had further enhanced viral infection. This study could explain why massive numbers of those vaccinated across the world have been infected and have experienced an increased prevalence in severe disease.
Caution Raised Over SARS Vaccine: Jab Against One Strain Might Worsen Infection With Others
Aware that the disease could re-emerge, several groups have been trying to make a vaccine against the virus. They are mainly trying to find ways to expose people to a protein on the virus's coat, called the spike protein, which helps it to enter cells. This should jolt the immune system into recognizing the virus during a future infection and making antibodies that attack it.
In the new study, Gary Nabel of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, and his co-workers injected mice with spike protein from a SARS virus taken from a human patient infected in early 2003. They then collected the antibodies the animals produced. In lab experiments, they showed that these antibodies were unable to attack spike protein from a different strain of SARS, isolated from a patient infected in late 2003.
The team next tested whether the antibodies would attack spike proteins from two SARS strains isolated from civets, from which the virus is thought to have originally jumped into humans. In this case, they found hints that the antibodies actually boosted the ability of the virus to infect cells.
This raises the prospect that a vaccine against one strain of SARS virus could prove ineffective against others. Worse, a jab against one strain might even aggravate an infection with SARS virus from civets or another species.
Excerpts from Evasion of Antibody Neutralization in Emerging Severe ARS Coronaviruses: (The study “Caution Raised Over SARS Vaccine” was based on)
Both of the studies from 2005, suggest the spike proteins from the SARS vaccines could be the underlying factor that has led to worsened infections in those vaccinated. These studies further suggest that the reason the world is seeing higher cases counts and hospitalizations, is due to the spike protein in the vaccines causing worsening infections from the Delta Variant. As seen above, the list of contents in the vaccines have yet to be released to the public due to the vaccines being patented. This is a major issue because individuals are not truly informed of the potential risks associated with the ingredients of the vaccine. Which is a violation of the Voluntary Informed Consent clause, in the Nuremberg Code. The ingredients of the vaccine that are known, have been proven to be toxic, and have led to major health issues as a result of these toxic substances. Numerous health professionals and scientists have raised the alarm about the potential risks of the Covid vaccines but since the tv tells people they are safe, individuals have jumped at the next chance to get the shot. Blindly following and trusting pharmaceutical companies and politicians is not a wise decision.
Can mRNA Alter DNA?
A point of emphasis surrounding the vaccine ingredients is the injection of synthetic mRNA, leading to the possible alteration of one’s DNA. This occurrence has not been definitively proven to be a result from the Covid Vaccines but data suggests a significant possibility of these vaccines possessing the ability to cause permanent DNA alteration.
An article from early 2017, examined the pharmaceutical company Moderna and the company’s hailmary attempt at the reinvention of medicine. The article provides direct quotes from the company’s CEO Stéphane Bancel and his promise that Moderna’s new therapies “will change the world.” This article will be used to provide perspective, keep in mind the date in which the article was written. (2017)
Lavishly Funded Moderna Hits Safety Problems in Bold Bid to Revolutionize Medicine:
The company’s premise: Using custom-built strands of messenger RNA, known as mRNA, it aims to turn the body’s cells into ad hoc drug factories, compelling them to produce the proteins needed to treat a wide variety of diseases. But mRNA is a tricky technology. Several major pharmaceutical companies have tried and abandoned the idea, struggling to get mRNA into cells without triggering nasty side effects.
In order to protect mRNA molecules from the body’s natural defenses, drug developers must wrap them in a protective casing. For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients.
Yet Moderna could not make its therapy work, former employees and collaborators said. The safe dose was too weak, and repeat injections of a dose strong enough to be effective had troubling effects on the liver in animal studies.
This article is provided to show that four years ago, the use of mRNA in vaccines had just begun and the prospective results hadn’t materialized. Read the last quote provided and revert back to the 2016 study on Graphene Oxide (nanoparticle delivery system), where the dosage implications associated with toxicity were mentioned. Vaccine development takes on average 10-15 years. Just four years ago, Moderna was scrambling to determine if the use of mRNA technology in vaccines was even possible.
Another article highlighted quotes from a 2017 TED Talk where Moderna’s Chief Medical Officer Dr. Tal Zaks discussed “hacking the software of life.” This article is also included to further provide perspective. Zaks discusses how the use of mRNA in vaccines helps with “rewriting genetic code” and refers to this as “information therapy.” RNA serves as a messenger that transmits information from DNA in our genes to the protein. Think of mRNA as a flash drive and your body serving as a computer. In theory, if you insert the flash drive with a specific function, the computer will perform said function. This is where the line of trans-humanism becomes blurry. In the movie Jurassic Park, the scientists “play God” by manipulating genetic code and we all know how that turned out.
Modern’s Top Scientist: “We Are Actually Hacking the Software of Life”
In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So we think about it as an operating system. So if you could change that, if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.
If you think about what it is we’re trying to do. We’ve taken information and our understanding of that information and how that information is transmitted in a cell, and we’ve taken our understanding of medicine and how to make drugs, and we’re fusing the two. We think of it as information therapy. Information therapy. Just like a computer software code.
Starting to understand the Jurassic Park reference?
Harvard Study: Disclaimer
The concept of mRNA becoming a permanent part of our DNA directly from the Covid vaccines has not been scientifically proven yet, but this study proves there is a viable pathway for this to phenomenon to happen. Molecular Biology exceeds my intellectual capacity but I still believe this study possesses valuable information and should be noted.
The results of a study by MIT and Harvard Scientists, suggests there is a viable cellular pathway where SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA fragments could become a permanent fixture of our DNA. The study was actually focused around figuring out the cause of positive PCR test results in individuals long after infection. They sought to determine if viral segments of RNA from Covid were permanently integrated into our DNA. This would allow the body to constantly create viral segments of RNA, which in turn results in false positive PCR test results. (Explained in next section) The results of the study serve as conjecture when considering the possibility of synthetic mRNA becoming a permanent fixture of your DNA.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA Reverse-Transcribed & Integrated into the Human Genome:
To be fair, this study didn’t show that the RNA from the current vaccines is being integrated into our DNA. However, they did show, quite convincingly, that there exists a viable cellular pathway whereby snippets of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA could become integrated into our genomic DNA. That being said, this data can be used to make a conjecture as to whether the RNA present in an RNA vaccine could potentially alter human DNA. This is because an mRNA vaccine consists of snippets of the viral RNA from the genome of SARS-CoV-2; in particular, the current mRNA vaccines harbor stabilized mRNA which encodes the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which is the protein that enables the virus to bind to cell-surface receptors and infect our cells.
Segments of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA can become integrated into human genomic DNA.
Segments of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA retro-integrated into human genomic DNA in cell culture. This retro-integration into genomic DNA of COVID-19 patients is also implied indirectly from the detection of chimeric RNA transcripts in cells derived from COVID-19 patients.
Although the Harvard study doesn’t conclude that Covid vaccines have in fact altered DNA, it does prove the possibility of synthetic mRNA becoming a permanent fixture of our DNA. Without course work and experience in Molecular Biology, understanding the intricacies of this particular study are slim. The video below will help clear up any confusion.
A video from Alila Medical Media, narrated by Dr. Charles Hoffe, helps explain how mRNA vaccines work and the potential effects they can have on our bodies. This video helps illustrate and explain mRNA technology in layman’s terms. This video should provide a sense of clarity in relation to the Harvard study and this section in itself.
The information provided in this section was to help provide perspective about the unknown risks associated with Covid vaccines. If it’s proven that these vaccines are in fact altering an individual’s DNA, then we have crossed into an era of trans-humanism and the reversal of these changes are slim to none. The idea of mRNA usage in vaccines to further medicine is a great concept in theory, but no long term studies have been completed to ensure safety behind doing so. Take the information for what it’s worth, the possibility of permanent DNA alteration is something individuals need to understand prior to consenting to the vaccine.
PCR Test Fraud:
The PCR test has been the foundation of the Covid-19 pandemic, deriving from the theory that asymptomatic spread was occurring. In part 2 of this series, I included a massive study from Wuhan, which concluded asymptomatic spread was obsolete and this foundation was not based on science. PCR tests are a reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection mechanism, which through amplification of cycle thresholds, are used to detect viral genetic fragments. These tests have been falsely used as a diagnostic tool to detect “Covid.” According the the FDA: “A specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).” The number of cycles used have been so broad (high), any viral segment of any coronaviruses (common cold etc) end up detected. Using high cycle thresholds increases the likelihood of false positives. For example, if one were to use a PCR test with the same cycle threshold to determine if someone was drinking and driving, every individual would fail due to alcohol molecules in everyday items and how the amplification process is conducted. Thus rendering PCR tests unreliable when being used as a diagnostic tool to determine if someone has a Covid infection.
Here’s an excerpt from a lawsuit I’ll provide in part 5, that shows PCR test manufacturer’s cycle threshold recommendations:
On July 21st, 2021, the CDC issued a notice of a class I recall of the PCR tests that have been used as the diagnostic screening tool for Covid-19. The notice states that after December 31st, 2021, the CDC will withdraw the EUA request from the FDA. A class I recall is the most serious type of recall and stated by the FDA as: “a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” The notice from the CDC states that labs are encouraged to consider the adoption of a testing method that can differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. Remember how the flu magically disappeared? Make note of the CDC differentiation statement and I’ll touch on that later in this section.
Labeling distributed with certain configurations of the test includes performance claims that did not accurately reflect the performance estimates observed during the clinical studies of the tests. The performance characteristics of the test have not been adequately established, presenting a risk of false results.
False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of an appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results.
CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test won the Nobel Chemistry Prize for the invention of PCR tests in 1993. He was known to be a heavy critic of Voldemort Fauci and was very outspoken against him. Dr. Mullis has been seen in interviews stating the PCR test is not a meant to be a diagnostic tool nor does it measure viral load of viruses. The test was designed to detect genetic material such as DNA and RNA sequences. Think of it as a microscope and the goal is to see if something is present, one would then increase the magnification until the item on the slide is present. Increasing the magnification doesn’t provide details about what the item is, it merely proves that something is there. Interestingly, Dr. Mullis mysteriously died in August of 2019, just before the pandemic started. Coincidence?
In fall of 2020, a Portuguese Appeals Court ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people on the sole basis of a positive PCR test. This ruling is extremely important when trying to understand how PCR tests are driving the pandemic narrative. The court made a motion that stated “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present.” This motion further clarifies my PCR test threshold example and helps confirm that high cycle thresholds for the test, have resulted in inflated case numbers.
Journal on Geopolitics & International Relations: Portuguese Appeals Court Rules PCR Tests as Unreliable & Unlawful to Quarantine Citizens
If someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.
A PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person.
Dr. Fauci, mid-November, 2020: What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard… if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule… It’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it’s like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. …So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it’s just dead nucleotides, period.
Is anyone else still perplexed by the fact that the flu magically disappeared? Well, this excerpt from the CDC states, PCR tests cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. This means that even if the PCR test comes back positive, the test itself cannot rule out the possibility of an individual having the flu or the common cold. This implies the possibility of flu cases being classified as Covid infections. The excerpt also says the detection of viral RNA (positive test) may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that Covid is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
Remember this statement? CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. This excerpt provides justification that PCR tests have falsely inflated Covid numbers due to the lack of capability to differentiate between diseases.
Another interesting concept surrounding the PCR tests, is the lack of capability to determine variants. How many variants do officials claim are out there now? Working our way right through the Greek alphabet. A citizen submitted an information request to the CDC and the information provided from the CDC is cause for concern. The CDC claims that '“however, these tests will not be able to tell you which specific variant you (or a patient) might have.” I find this statement particularly interesting, considering local officials and officials around the country are claiming all positive tests are the Delta variant within a day or so of performing the PCR test. The next statement from the email states: “To tell which variant might be present in a specimen, scientists must perform whole genomic sequencing (WGS) on that specimen.” So not only do the PCR tests lack the capability to determine the variant present, they also lack the ability to rule out other diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. Interesting isn’t it?
Given the information about the faulty PCR tests that have been used to determine if someone is infected with Covid, one can draw the conclusion that these tests have resulted in massively inflated case numbers. The inventor of the test explicitly stated the test was not designed to be a diagnostic tool. The CDC and FDA have issued a class I recall of the tests due to a failed performance review. A Portuguese Appeals Court ruled that the use of the PCR test as a diagnostic tool is unreliable and unlawful to use the test as a basis for the quarantine of an individual. FDA cycle threshold guidelines for labs exceed the number of thresholds in which overlord Fauci mentioned unreliable. Influenza cases magically disappeared and then the CDC encourages labs to adopt a method of testing that can differentiate between Covid and influenza infections. Starting to see how the faulty PCR tests are driving the pandemic narrative? Given the likelihood of false positives, how inflated are Covid case numbers?
Final Points:
Studies show that there are unknown risks associated with the known ingredients of the vaccine. The lack of long term clinical safety trials imply we don’t know what affects these ingredients could have on the body as time goes on. Only time will tell the true effects graphene oxide, synthetic mRNA and spike proteins will have on the human body. Are spike proteins the root cause of increased case numbers across the world mainly in those vaccinated? The studies from 2005 seem to point in that direction. Facts that surround the faulty PCR tests, allow one to come to the conclusion that case numbers have been severely inflated. The usage of a test that was not designed to be a diagnostic tool has been the driving force that has led to the false perception of an everlasting pandemic. Due to the PCR test faultiness, we can assume the flu didn’t magically disappear and a number of Covid cases were in fact, influenza. The idea of completely eradicating a virus that has spread all over the world, is quite delusional. Knowing this, we can assume Covid has become endemic thus we will have to learn to live with it. The production of these vaccines was expedited exponentially, so to claim they are safe and effective, is patently false. Vaccine development takes on average 10-15 years; research and discovery 2-10 years, pre-clinical animal studies 1-5 years, and clinical human trials in four phases taking up to 5 years. Although I personally do not agree with the vaccines, if Operation Warpspeed hadn’t been implemented, we would’ve been under perpetual lockdowns until a vaccine was developed. Which would have led to complete economic and societal ruin, similar to the Hunger Games. It was the lesser of two evils.
Everyone deserves the RIGHT to make an educated and well informed decision in regards to one’s personal health but sadly that is not the reality we are living in. I’m in no way trying to tell anyone what choice to make regarding personal health but please do your own research. Just because the tv tells you one thing does not mean it is accurate. The bureaucratic sociopaths dictating everyone’s lives do not care about the individuals they aspire to control. We are truly experiencing the most unprecedented time in history but we the people have the power to change this downward spiral trajectory the world is headed down. Demand from public officials to know why information that I presented is being shielded from the public and make your voice heard. I decided to embark on this mini-series to help inform and educate the public about what’s really going on. I hope this article provided some clarity and insight into the ingredients of the Covid vaccines and potential risks associated, as well as how faulty PCR tests have driven the pandemic narrative.
In part 5 of this mini-series, I will cover the legal, moral and ethical issues surrounding the Covid charade. I will also prove that the media and officials are blatantly lying about the FDA “approval” of the Pfizer vaccine (hint: it’s not approved). As well as provide Federal Court Filings suggesting major foul play from those that suggest “it’s for your health.”
If you missed The Truth About Covid: Parts 1-3, I suggest reading those in order to stay informed over various topics pertaining to Covid.
If you want to know what is in store for the United States in the coming weeks and months, take a look at my article: Freedom vs. Dystopian Hell.
If you like the articles I am putting together, please share with everyone you know! I sincerely appreciate those that take the time to read through these lengthy write ups.