Introduction:
Elections are the cornerstone our country was founded upon and is one of our nation’s most sacred traditions. Our Founding Fathers adopted an election system that in theory, would minimize possible corruption and allow the citizens to determine our nation’s leaders. Preserving and securing our election system is vital to our country’s survival, otherwise we don’t have a country. Presidential Elections are held once every four years and are determined by the electoral college system. Every state has a given number of electoral votes and in order to win the Presidency, a candidate must gain a 270 vote electoral college majority. The number of electoral votes for a state is determined by the state’s population. Two slates of electors are appointed by the state’s two political parties and the slate of electors that cast their votes at the capital for President, is determined by the results of the General Election. The electoral college system is designed to balance rural and urban citizens votes, meaning the most populous cities and states don’t have a weighted advantage in elections.
The November 3rd, 2020 General Election was the most important and polarizing election in modern history. The facts surrounding the election are still yet to fully be known but it was not the safest election in history. The events that led up and followed the election, are those that will be remembered in history forever. Every Presidential Election in history has been called for a candidate on the night of the election, with all of the ballots being counted on election night. The 2020 election was different. Late November 3rd, it was announced that six key battleground states would stop counting of mail in ballots and proceed to restart first thing on the morning of November 4th. Conveniently, Trump was ahead in all six states prior to the call to stop the count. These states include Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The cities that draw major concern from these states are Phoenix, Atlanta, Detroit, Las Vegas, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee, all of which are notorious for nefarious election activity. The counties in which these six cities are located, were the six counties that determined the “outcome” of the 2020 Presidential Election.
In this article, I will highlight a multitude of statistical anomalies that were a result of the 2020 General Election. I will provide insight into electronic voting machine vulnerabilities and evidence of systemic voter fraud that occurred from the use of said machines. I show how illegal and unconstitutional alterations to election laws, ultimately determined the outcome of the election. The main premise of this article, is to show that the only way to restore confidence in our election system and to preserve election integrity, is through the adoption and utilization of paper ballots. By highlighting issues surrounding the 2020 General Election, it allows one to come to the conclusion that the adoption and usage paper ballots is the only way to alleviate these issues in future elections.
Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote…that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country. - Samuel Adams
A Historical Perspective:
In order to grasp the gravity of the situation, one must understand the vast array of discrepancies that were a result of the 2020 General Election. Donald Trump ran a campaign that garnered national support never before seen for a Presidential candidate. Joe Biden’s campaign was virtually non-existent nor was his support remotely comparable to that of Donald Trumps. The utilization of mass mail in voting and the acceptance of ballots later than November 3rd, has never occurred in the history of our nation’s elections. Normally, the winner of the Presidency is announced on election day, but this was not the case for the 2020 election. Virtually every discrepancy that surrounds the election, has never occurred throughout the history of our country’s elections. In this section, I briefly touch on various statistical anomalies and historical context surrounding Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, in order to provide perspective for the remainder of the article.
General Flynn & Seth Keshel: 10 Indisputable Facts About the 2020 Election
5 Election Statistics About Obama, Trump & Biden Appear to Discredit Election Results:
To provide some perspective:
Obama 2008: 69 million votes, 873 counties, 18 of 19 bellwether counties
Trump 2020: 74 million votes, 2,547 counties, 18 of 19 bellwether counties
Biden 2020: 81 million votes, 509 counties, 1 of 19 bellwether counties
Obama and Trump both won Florida, North Carolina, Iowa, and Ohio. These four states have been won by the same candidate 13 times since 1896 and every single time, said candidate has won the Presidency. Since 1892, every incumbent that gained votes won re-election, Trump gained 11 million votes from 2016. In contrast, Obama lost 4 million votes in his 2012 re-election campaign. Obama won House seats, Trump won House seats and Biden actually lost House seats.
Maricopa County, Arizona accounts for nearly two-thirds of votes in the state of Arizona. Maricopa County has not supported a Democratic nominee since Harry Truman in 1948. In 2020, Trump set a record for Republican Presidential nominees, for net additional votes in Maricopa, he added 248,000 additional votes from his 2016 performance (he also won this county in 2016). This type of vote increase in one county from an incumbent is unheard of, but yet Joe Biden allegedly won Maricopa County?
Joe Biden has launched four Presidential campaigns throughout his 48 year political career. Biden was elected to the United States Senate from Delaware in 1972 and he officially took office at 30 years old. I find it humorous how individuals complain about specific issues that Democratic candidates promise to fix but fail to realize these issues were caused by these candidates. The logic behind voting for a career politician and expecting change to occur, is quite literally the definition of insanity. In 1984, Biden received 0.03% of the DNC primary vote, in 1988, Biden received 0.05% of the DNC primary vote and in 2008, Biden received 0.22% of the DNC primary vote. Historically, Joe Biden hasn’t been a well liked candidate within his own party given the results of his first three Presidential campaigns, but in his fourth Presidential campaign he managed to receive the most votes in U.S. History?
Kamala Harris, former Attorney General for the state of California from 2011-2017, was elected to the Senate in 2017 and served until 2021. Kamala launched her Presidential campaign in February of 2019 and had 12% democratic voter support after the debut of her campaign. During the second democratic debate, she attacked Joe Biden for his record on race and claimed she believed Tara Reade’s claims that Joe sexually assaulted her while she was a staff assistant in his office in 1993. Harris dropped out of the Democratic primary in December of 2019 after her support plummeted to less than 3% of democratic voters. She dropped out of the primary before voting even began and despite spending nearly $40 million on her campaign. If you know about Harris’s track record while serving as AG of California or her familial history of owning slaves, it’s apparent that she’s a very unlikeable and egregious individual. Not to mention, she literally slept her way into power but I won’t dive into that.
The historical context that surrounds Joe Biden’s and Kamala Harris’s political careers, brings rise to questioning the validity of the 2020 Presidential Election results. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have been historically disliked Democratic Presidential candidates within their own party. Joe is a career politician that has sold out the country for money due to his lifelong position of power. Kamala is a descendent of a slave owner and prefers to spread her legs to gain positions of power rather than on merit. Knowing this, how can anyone honestly say that Biden and Harris garnered the most votes in U.S. History?
Unconstitutional Changes to Election Laws: Attorney Marc Elias
Every state in the U.S. has a State Legislature, the responsibility of the State Legislature is to create and reform all laws for the state they represent. The Legislature is made up of a specific number of State House Representatives and a specific number of State Senators. The number of representatives in both houses is determined by the population of their respected state. State Legislatures have the sole authority to create, change and implement laws, thus mandates for Covid from local and state officials carry no legal authority. Understanding the process in which State Governments operate and the role they serve, is imperative to understand anything political that happens in one’s state.
Perkins-Coie is the law firm that Democrats use for any legal issue they need handled and the most notorious attorney for this law firm was Marc Elias (he left Perkins-Coie right before Durham indicted Michael Sussman, coincidence?). Marc Elias has been the right hand legal juggernaut for Hillary Clinton, this fact alone, provides all you need to know about Marc Elias. In the months leading up to the election, Marc Elias and his Perkins-Coie team of democrat operatives filed lawsuits that challenged election laws in all 50 states. Elias sued to prevent county boards of elections from disqualifying ballots if signatures didn’t match those on file and to prevent rejection of ballots that weren’t in the security envelope required. They also sued county election boards to accept late ballots that didn’t arrive prior to the deadline of November 3rd and sued to force officials to accept late ballots without a postmark to prove they were cast on or before election day. Marc Elias was successful in changing election laws in 37 states that had been in place for years, these states include North Carolina, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Nevada. These election laws were changed due to court order, which was illegal and unconstitutional because Elias bypassed State Legislatures who have the sole authority to alter laws, especially election laws. Perkins-Coie used Covid as a guise to make the alterations to these laws. Is the convenience of Covid occurring during an election year starting to make more sense? Ever wondered why the judges a President appoints are so important? We can thank Obama’s judicial appointments for the illegal and unconstitutional alteration of election laws.
If these laws hadn’t been altered unconstitutionally, the results of the 2020 Presidential Election would drastically be different. The laws that were changed determined the entire outcome of the 2020 General Election and provided an avenue for large scale fraud to occur throughout the nation. Marc Elias will go down in infamy as one of the most sinister attorneys to walk this planet. Ask yourself, why would Hillary Clinton’s attorney, advised by the Biden camp, launch a nationwide effort to alter election laws through bypassing State Legislatures in the months that led up to the election? Hint: Republicans have an overwhelming majority in State Legislatures across the country.
Statistical Anomalies Surrounding The 2020 Presidential Election:
A multitude of statistical anomalies surround the 2020 Presidential Election and the only rebuttal by democrats and the media is “fact-checkers say..” or revert to election related lawsuits. They fail to mention is that there still is ongoing litigation with multiple lawsuits and every lawsuit that was dropped, was dropped due to a lack of standing, thus none of the cases were decided on the actual merits of the case. For the record, the Trump camp filed four lawsuits in total, the rest were filed independently. In this section, I will provide a number of statistical anomalies that suggest the results of the election should be questioned.
To provide some perspective, here are Trump’s leads in multiple swing states before the unprecedented call to stop the count:
Trump led in Pennsylvania by 682,000 votes (15.2%)
Trump led in Georgia by 311,000 votes (7.5%)
Trump led in Michigan by 307,000 votes (9.6%)
Trump led in Wisconsin by 128,000 votes (4.9%)
Trump led in North Carolina by 77,000 votes (1.4%)
I briefly mentioned the bellwether county anomaly in the first section but I’ll provide further insight into arguably the most peculiar anomaly that occurred in the 2020 Presidential Election. Since 1980, 19 out of 3,000 counties throughout the U.S. have had a perfect track record in voting for the successful Presidential candidate and these are called bellwether counties. In 2020, Donald Trump won 18 out of 19 bellwether counties. Based off of historical and numerical trends, the candidate that wins 18 of the 19 bellwether counties, is the candidate named the winner of the Presidential election. For example, Vigo County, Indiana has only failed to predict the winner of the Presidential Election once in the last 100 years and Trump won this county by a large margin. Valencia County, New Mexico has had a perfect track record in predicting the successful Presidential candidate since 1952 and Trump won this county by 10 percent in 2020. Bellwether counties are arguably the most accurate predictor of the successful Presidential candidate and Trump won 18 of these counties by large margins. The outcomes for bellwether counties suggest major statistical improbabilities of a Biden victory.
The next anomaly I want to address is the incumbent loss anomaly, I briefly mentioned this in the first section. In 1888, incumbent Grover Cleveland failed to win re-election despite an increased vote total from his initial campaign. Donald Trump was the first incumbent in 132 years to ‘lose’ his re-election bid, despite substantially increasing his vote total from 2016. Trump’s increase of 11 million votes from his 2016 total, is the largest increase in vote total for an incumbent in U.S. History. Like I stated in the first section, Obama lost nearly four million votes in his 2012 re-election campaign but still won re-election.
The House of Representatives anomaly is one of the more distinct anomalies. House Reps serve two year terms and House Elections coincide with four year Presidential Elections. Historically, the Presidential candidate that wins the election typically gains House seats within their party from the campaign momentum generated by the winning candidate at the top of the ticket. But in 2020, the opposite occurred. An analysis of Presidential Elections since 1964, found that the party winning the Presidency, on average gains 16 House seats. The Democrats lost a net of 12 House seats thus the seats were flipped due to Trump’s campaign momentum. Overall the Democrats had a swing of -28 seats from the historical average, which is a major anomalous outlier. Prior to the election, the Cook Political Report listed 27 House races as “toss ups” and Republicans won all 27 of these House “toss up” races. Overall, the GOP had a net gain of 12 House seats which is a massive swing in political power in this last cycle. The results of House races should reflect that of the Presidential race but that wasn’t the case for the 2020 General Election.
Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Group in Dallas, performed an audit on Texas voting machines from 2018 and examined the voter turnout in numerous counties in Michigan following the 2020 General Election. Ramsland submitted a sworn affidavit as a result of his findings from the machine audit and his data analysis of counties in Michigan. Michigan was one of the states that stopped the ballot count on November 3rd and is a swing state under major scrutiny as a result of the 2020 election. Ramsland observed voter turnout for precincts in which ballots for the General Election were cast and compared these numbers to estimated voters. He found 3,276 precincts that had voter turnout percentages ranging from 84% to 350%. Normalizing the Turnout Percentage of this grouping to 80%, (still way above the national average for turnout percentage), reveals 431,954 excess ballots allegedly processed. This should be obvious but a specific area cannot exceed 100% voter turnout, let alone average 80+% over the majority of the state. The percentages of voter turnout in 3,276 precincts in the state of Michigan are statistical anomalies that can only be explained by the injection of fraudulent ballots. Unfortunately, this occurrence happened all over the country.
An analyst from Switzerland observed multiple anomalous vote total changes for the states of Wisconsin and Michigan in real time. These changes occurred in the dead of night on the morning of November 4th and happened in a matter of minutes. Here’s what he observed:
Wisconsin:
At 3:37 AM CST, total votes were 3,018,212; Trump had 1,536,270 votes (50.9%); Biden 1,427,614 votes (47.3%); other candidates 54,328 votes (1.8%).
At 3:42 AM CST, total votes were 3,186,598; Trump had 1,561,433 votes (49.0%); Biden 1,570,993 votes (49.3%); other candidates 54,172 votes (1.7%).
Total increase in Trump votes in 5 minutes: 25,163 (1.64%).
Total increase in Biden votes in 5 minutes: 143,379 (10.04%).
Before the Biden vote dump, both candidates’ votes were increasing at about the same rate, 1.64% per 5 minutes. So, the “legitimate” Biden vote increase is likely around 23,400 votes. The remaining 119,979 votes are fake.
Michigan:
At 5:32 AM CST on November 4, total votes were 4,574,555; Trump had 2,346,747 votes (51.3%); Biden 2,150,041 votes (47.0%); other candidates 77,767 votes (1.7%). Then, still at 5:32 AM CST, only five seconds later than the prior reading, total votes were 4,724,327; Trump had 2,352,715 votes (49.8%); Biden 2,291,299 votes (48.5%); other candidates 80,313 votes (1.7%). In that brief five-second period, Trump’s vote total increased by 5,968 (0.25%) while Biden’s vote total increased by 141,258 (6.57%).
Then between 6:03 and 6:14 AM CST, more than 113,000 “votes” were counted, at an average rate of 9,800 ballots per minute. Total votes increased sharply to 4,866,279. Trump votes were 2,403,942 (49.6%), an increase of 36,965 votes (8.16% increase). Biden votes were 2,379,610 (48.9%), an increase of 69,699 votes (30.17% increase).
Of those 113K total votes, 40K showed up in the last two minutes – between 6:12 and 6:14 AM. In two minutes, Trump gained 5,665 votes; Biden gained 29,588 votes. That’s about 5.2 Biden votes for every Trump vote. Then the ballot-counting quieted down and returned to “normal,” with votes for Trump and Biden about equal, until just before 8 AM, when another sudden burst of 107,700 heavily-Biden votes – 41,914 for Trump, 65,786 for Biden erased Trump’s lead and tied the candidates at 49.2% each of the total votes.
As the analyst observed, these massive changes in vote totals through the dead of night are causes for concern. If these states announced they stopped all counting and would commence the morning of the 4th, why would these vote total changes occur in the dead of night? The disproportionate increases in vote totals for Biden, suggest the occurrence of major malfeasance throughout the early hours of November 4th.
In the state of Virginia an interesting anomaly appeared as the tabulation of ballots continued throughout the night of the 3rd and into the early hours of November 4th. When ballot batches are ran through a tabulator to be counted, multiple batches won’t yield the exact same vote percentage split between the candidates. This may occur once or twice but when this occurs for 30+ batches in a row, something is clearly off. In over 20+ batches of mail in ballots that were tabulated, a 54% to 45% split of the votes occurred in favor of Biden. In another 10+ batches, a 54% to 44% split of votes also occurred in favor of Biden. In order for something such as this to happen, systemic fraud would have to be present, otherwise the statistical probability of this occurring is below 0%. It would be the equivalent to flipping a coin 100 times in a row and yielding the same exact result for all 100 flips.
The last statistical anomaly I want to address is the mail-in ballot rejection rate anomaly. Mail in ballots were a hot commodity in the 2020 General Election, due to fear instilled in the population with the Covid-19 charade. Individuals seem to forget that the Covid-19 pandemic occurred during an election year, which is rather convenient given the mass utilization of mail in ballots as a result of said pandemic. In the 2016 General Election, the mail in ballot rejection rate around the country was 1% on average, with some states as high as 6%. In 2016, the rejection rate in the state of Georgia was 6% but was significantly lower in the 2020 General Election, as the state of Georgia had a rejection rate average of 0.2% in 2020. Keep in mind, Georgia is one of the six swing states Trump narrowly “lost” in. The average rejection rate for all six of these swing states was a whopping 0.3% . The significantly lower mail in ballot rejection rates during the 2020 election, suggest major systemic fraud due to massive increases in mail in ballot utilization. It’s simple, an increase mail in ballots results in a higher probability of mail in ballot rejection but this was not the case for the 2020 election.
Given this information that surround multiple statistical anomalies in regard to Biden’s alleged victory on November 3rd, a rational individual would begin to question the validity of the election results. Without diving into the specifics in each of the six swing states, these anomalies alone put Biden’s victory into question. Numbers are the only constant on the planet and when the numbers that surround the 2020 General Election suggest major foul play and systemic fraud were present, odds are, that’s what happened. Regardless of your political stance, every individual should want to know the truth about the 2020 election. Preserving election integrity is arguably the most important issue in present day. If we do not have secure and honest elections, we do not have a country nor a Constitutional Republic. If citizens of the United States cannot honestly choose the rightful winner of the Presidency, we have officially transitioned into a dictatorship and this should alarm every individual. How do you think leaders such as Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Mao retained power for such long periods of time? Eliminating the voice of the people and ultimately stealing the power away from the people, is your answer.
Voting Machine Vulnerabilities:
The use of electronic voting machines has become more popular over the years due to the convenience and “efficiency” of the machines. Voting machines allow mass amounts of ballots to be counted in a fraction of the time it would take to hand count and user friendliness has also been a selling point. Although electronic voting machines offer some perks, the machines do have various downsides, some of which include, connectivity to the internet and lack of confirmation of one’s ballot being tallied correctly. Since the 2020 General Election, Democrats and the media propaganda arm have been adamant about the safety and security of voting machines. In this section, I will highlight the detriments of using electronic voting machines, as well as provide information that suggest the occurrence of vote flipping and data manipulation was present during the 2020 election.
Historical Context:
On February 19th, 1974: The Direct Recording Electronic Voting Machine was patented by McKay, Ziebold and Kirby. In 1990, the FEC released the first guidelines of standards for computer based voting. In 1996, the first Governmental election was conducted over the internet.
In December of 2005: Blackbox voting systems, electronic voting machines demonstrated hack-ability: Cybersecurity experts were able to hack into the central vote tabulator of the voting system, without leaving a trace of any of their actions. This exercise was done to demonstrate the software running these voting systems is vulnerable to tampering.
On May 11th, 2006: Blackbox voting systems, electronic voting machines demonstrated “backdoors” in the software. The backdoors allowed the software to be modified in several ways, which included a “cheating” software that could be installed months or years before it is executed.
On September 13th, 2006: A computer and cybersecurity expert installed malware onto a Diebold voting machine in less than a minute. An attacker could install malware that could steal votes, modify all records, logs and tabulators consistent with a fraudulent vote count, in under a minute. The introduction of a malware virus on a voting machine could spread machine to machine depending on the connectivity.
Given the historical context of voting machines, it’s rather apparent that electronic voting machines possess vulnerabilities that can affect the outcome of an election. As early as 2005, voting machines have shown the possibility of being hacked and potential for a malware virus to be uploaded with the intention of altering the outcome of the given election.
In 2016, Princeton professor Andrew Appel, set out to hack into an electronic voting machine and decided to purchase an older machine online. Appel and a graduate student were able to pick the machine’s lock in under seven seconds. Then proceeded to extract the four ROM chips that were not soldered to the machine’s circuit board, which implied the ability to replace them in rather simple fashion. The overall effort to hack the voting machine was completed in under seven minutes.
He summoned a graduate student named Alex Halderman, who could pick the machine’s lock in seven seconds. Clutching a screwdriver, he deftly wedged out the four ROM chips—they weren’t soldered into the circuit board, as sense might dictate making it simple to replace them with one of his own: A version of modified firmware that could throw off the machine’s results, subtly altering the tally of votes, never to betray a hint to the voter. The attack was concluded in minutes.
The Princeton group has a simple message: That the machines that Americans use at the polls are less secure than the iPhones they use to navigate their way there. They’ve seen the skeletons of code inside electronic voting’s digital closet, and they’ve mastered the equipment’s vulnerabilities perhaps better than anyone (a contention the voting machine companies contest, of course). They insist the elections could be vulnerable at myriad strike points, among them the software that aggregates the precinct vote totals, and the voter registration rolls that are increasingly digitized. But the threat, the cyber experts say, starts with the machines that tally the votes and crucially keep a record of them—or, in some cases, don't.
Andrew Appel displayed the simplicity of hacking into an electronic voting machine in merely a few minutes. Appel’s efforts were conducted prior to the 2016 election and further proves the vast vulnerabilities that lie within electronic voting machines.
Since the November 3rd election, Democrats and the media have claimed that electronic voting machines are safe and secure. They have also claimed that the election was the “safest” and “most secure” in history, despite the multitude of statistical anomalies and evidence of large scale voter fraud. If the election was the safest and most secure in history, why have they constantly attacked those that question the outcome? Why are they so scared about actual audits? Here’s a compilation of Democrats speaking on the vast vulnerabilities of electronic voting machines prior to 2020. The Democrats and media don’t want the public seeing what they had to say about voting machines prior to 2020.
Dr. Douglas Frank, Ph.D. in Surface Electro-analytical Chemistry, expert in data collection, looked into voter registration specifics in various counties. After examination of voter registration data, Dr. Frank was able to discover the algorithm used to control the number of voter registrations and the number of ballots cast in a given county. He noticed a direct correlation between 2010 census data and voter registration data, which allowed the creation of phantom registered voters. In theory, the creation of phantom voters, provides a “credit line” of phantom voters that can be injected into the final ballot totals through electronic voting machines. The use of the 2010 census data caused the 2020 election vote total to be heavily inflated. Dr. Frank discovered the 6th degree polynomial used to electronically manipulate final vote totals in every county in the United States.
Dr. Frank: 2010 Census Data Used to Inflate 2020 Election Vote Totals
Dr. Frank: Absolute Interference (44:00-1:08:48)
Questioning the validity of Dr. Frank’s discovery is natural but seeing him apply the algorithm to various counties in various states and the results remain constant, any doubt of his discovery immediately disappears. When the algorithm is applied to the data in a given county, it’s rather apparent that vote total manipulation occurred due to electronic voting machines.
Since the November 3rd General Election, Mike Lindell has exhausted every resource at his disposal to uncover the truth about the election. Mainstream media outlets dismiss Mike Lindell as a lunatic and a crazy person, which is entirely false. Lindell is a former crack addict turn multi-millionaire pillow company founder, his story is remarkable and quite literally the definition of the American Dream. Early in 2021, Mike claimed he had “absolute proof” of the election theft and began to release a series of documentaries titled the Absolute Series. The first documentary of the series was called Absolute Proof, in this documentary Lindell and various cybersecurity experts display the real time connectivity and manipulation of voting machines from IP addresses all over the world. This documentary is very informative and provides real time data that proves foreign interference and voter machine manipulation occurred in the 2020 General Election.
Time stamps for foreign interference: 1:36:28-1:49:47
The time stamp provided for Absolute Proof, shows the extent of the foreign interference and electronic voting machine manipulation that occurred in the 2020 General Election. This information proves our election was not secure and highlights voting machine vulnerabilities.
Michigan attorney Matthew DePerno, helped conduct a forensic audit of voting machines used for the 2020 General Election in Antrim County, Michigan. The audit of the voting machines proved massive manipulation of the vote totals was evident in Antrim County. DePerno and his team uncovered outdated anti-virus software, significantly high ballot error rates and the use of an algorithm having caused the high ballot error rates. Antrim County reported a Biden victory, 63% of votes for Biden and 36% of votes for Trump. After the audit of Antrim County, the real result was a Trump victory with 61% of votes, to Biden’s 37% of votes.
Given the information in this section, one can come to the conclusion that the use of electronic voting machines presents a multitude of issues. Voting machines have been proven to be hack-able in merely a few minutes, which suggests large scale tampering of the machines is a possibility. We have been told the voting machines weren’t connected to the internet but that’s inherently false. Votes have been proven to be flipped, voter registration numbers have been inflated to create phantom voters and massive error rates suggest an algorithm was used to alter the results of the election. Knowing this, we must eliminate electronic voting machines in order to preserve election integrity moving forward.
The Navarro Report & Evidence of Voter Fraud:
Dr. Peter Navarro holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University and was a professor emeritus of Economics and Public Policy at the University of California-Irvine for more than 20 years. Navarro served as Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy at the White House during the Trump Administration. Following the November 3rd General Election, Dr. Navarro released the Navarro Report which consists of three volumes, all three volumes highlight a multitude of discrepancies surrounding the 2020 election results. The Navarro Report has proven to be strikingly accurate, given the new information that has come out of key contested swing states.
The Navarro Report highlights the possible number of fraudulent ballots in these swing states and the numbers are highly significant. The election laws that were illegally changed and the mass expansion of mail in ballot utilization played major roles in outcome of the 2020 General Election. The Navarro Report covered how the illegal changes to election laws, the expansion of mail in ballots, electronic voting machine manipulation and disastrous voter rolls, all played definitive roles in the election theft.
Dr. Douglas Frank discovered the 6th degree polynomial algorithm used to manipulate electronic voting machine vote totals. The algorithm was designed around the 2010 census in order to artificially inflate voter registration rolls through the creation of phantom voters. These illustrations from key swing states, prove that an algorithm was used to artificially inject fraudulent Biden votes.
I’m no math mathematician nor am I a data collection expert, but a sharp spike in the vote total for one candidate, implies the occurrence of fraudulent vote injections. The sharp spike in vote total skews the natural progression, which is the opposite of what should have occurred.
Garland Favorito and VoterGA, an election integrity non-profit organization he co-founded 16 years ago, have led the way to uncover the truth about the 2020 General Election in the state of Georgia. Favorito and VoterGA are in active litigation for the release of Fulton County’s mail in ballots, in order to initiate a forensic audit on said mail in ballots. VoterGA has uncovered a multitude of discrepancies that surround the Fulton County General Election. The group revealed 36 batches with 4,255 total extra votes that were erroneously added to the Fulton County “audit” and also found seven falsified audit tally sheets that contained fabricated vote totals for their respective batches. They also found that Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 tally sheets, which included more than 50,000 tally sheets from mail in ballots.
On September 25th, Favorito and VoterGA identified that Fulton County has more individuals registered to vote than who are actually eligible to vote. According to the Fulton County 2020 Presidential Election data, the county had 804,906 eligible voters but 806,451 individuals were registered to vote. In 2020, Fulton County had 100.2% voter registration. Remember how Dr. Frank cracked the algorithm and it’s correlation with the 2010 census, which in turn created a “credit line” of phantom voters? Well, the use of an algorithm will result in 100+% voter registration with the addition of phantom voters.
I shouldn’t have to say this but a county cannot exceed 100% voter registration. This high of a voter registration is only possible through the inflation of voter rolls with phantom voters. “Safest” and “most secure” election in history!
CNN’s broadcast on election night wasn’t the typical election night broadcast. Evidence of vote deductions and additions occurred in real time on live television. At 9:16pm ET, Biden’s vote total in Pennsylvania was 517,713 votes and Trump’s total was 352,736 votes. At 9:17pm ET, Biden’s vote total increased to 535,085 votes and Trump’s vote total decreased to 238,866 votes. From 9:16pm-9:17pm, Trump’s vote total saw a reduction of 113,870 votes. At 11:09pm ET, Trump’s vote total in Pennsylvania was 1,690,589 votes and Biden’s vote total was 1,252,587 votes. At 11:10pm ET, Trump’s vote total decreased to 1,670,631 votes and Biden’s vote total increased to 1,272,495 votes. From 11:09pm-11:10pm, Trump’s vote total saw a reduction of 19,958 votes meanwhile Biden saw an increase by 19,958 votes. These vote switches happened in real time, on live television, and the vote total changes suggest electronic voting machine data manipulation.
This section provided more information that suggests voter fraud occurred during the 2020 General Election. From electronic voting machine manipulation to fraudulent mail in ballot injection, it’s apparent that the 2020 General Election was not the most safe and secure. I could’ve provided more of evidence that suggests voter fraud occurred, but I believe the information provided got the point across. The mainstream media claims the election was free of fraud, but overwhelming amounts of evidence suggests otherwise. It baffles me when individuals echo mainstream media talking points without looking into the situation themselves. Just because you haven’t looked into the evidence, doesn’t mean there isn’t any. Corporate America overwhelmingly donated to the Biden campaign, thus the same people telling you fraud didn’t occur, are the same ones who bankrolled Biden’s campaign. Follow the money and everything will start to make sense.
Why Paper Ballots Are The Only Solution To Preserving Election Integrity:
In order to preserve election integrity moving forward, we must adopt paper ballots as our only method of casting a ballot. The only way to safeguard elections in the future is by eliminating the use of electronic voting machines and eliminating the expansion of mail in ballots. The only “mail in” ballots that should be used, are absentee ballots for members of the military. By removing all electronic voting machines, we can eliminate the risk of election management system hacks and eliminate manipulation of ballots through internet connectivity. Paper ballots must become the gold standard for elections, otherwise we will never have a secure election again. The utilization of paper ballots provides physical proof of voters intent, allows for an easy recount of votes and provides the public 100% oversight and transparency with their elections. Electronic voting machines can malfunction, need to be updated periodically and storage at the county level becomes an issue. Paper ballots eliminate these external issues that arise from the use of electronic voting machines.
As a country, we need to return to voting in our precincts and utilize paper ballots only. Voting in precincts, allows county parties to be directly involved with the election in their precinct and allows for voting to return to schools rather than public businesses. Voting in schools present the opportunity for students to help work the election and to become familiar with the election process. The use of paper ballots decreases the risk for wide scale fraud significantly due to the extreme likelihood of fraud being detected. Voting in precincts also decreases the amount of time it takes to count the ballots due to lower numbers of eligible voters.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published a book in 2018 titled Securing the Vote, Protecting American Democracy and the book provides insight over the many issues associated with electronic voting machines and our election system entirely. Passages from the book further provide credibility to the adoption of paper ballots and securing our election process.
Another issue with electronic voting machines, is the cost which taxpayers front the bill for. For example, the replacement of voting machines in Harris, Dallas and Tarrant Counties in 2018 had an estimated cost of $50 million. That cost is merely to replace the machines, that doesn’t include yearly maintenance and storage of the machines. Here are a few more examples of the extreme cost of electronic voting machines, in 2019:
Hays County spent $1.6 million on Hart InterCivic voting machines.
Travis County opted for ES&S systems at a cost of $8.1 million.
Williamson County purchased ES&S systems for $4.4 million.
Dallas County spent $25 million on ES&S voting machines & tabulation equipment, $6 million for poll books from Tenex but then also purchased $6 million of poll books from ES&S. This brought the total to $37 million spent for upgrading voting equipment.
Tarrant County spent $11 million on Hart InterCivic’s voting equipment.
El Paso County spent $5.8 million to upgrade voting equipment.
Potter County spent $1 million on upgrading voting equipment in 2017 and signed a contract with Hart InterCivic.
It’s apparent that the cost of using electronic voting machines is through the roof. On the contrary, the cost of using paper ballots is a fraction of the cost of using electronic voting machines.
Returning to paper ballots and voting in precincts, is the only way to preserve election integrity and safeguard elections moving forward. Given the vast array of discrepancies from the 2020 General Election, something has to be done in order to even have a country moving forward. Honest elections are the backbone to our Constitutional Republic and if we don’t safeguard one of our most sacred American traditions, the country as we know it will be gone forever.
Final Points:
The information provided suggests large scale systemic fraud occurred during the 2020 General Election. I highlighted a multitude of statistical anomalies that show Biden’s victory was highly improbable. I provided an array of issues that surround the use of electronic voting machines and how the elimination of said machines is imperative to the preservation of election integrity. Also provided was evidence of fraud that occurred in multiple contested swing states, that suggests major foul play was evident in the 2020 General Election. Insight into why the utilization of paper ballots is needed in order to restore confidence in our elections was also included in this article. I barely scratched the surface with evidence of voter fraud from the 2020 election but the evidence provided gets the point across. The Arizona Audit Report proved large scale fraud occurred in Maricopa County and that the state of Arizona shouldn’t have been certified. I’m not sure what will result from the report but the Federalist Papers do outline the State Legislature’s authority to recall their electors. Regardless of your political stance, what happened to this country has effected every individual and needs to be corrected. This isn’t about Republicans vs. Democrats, this is about the preservation of the cornerstone our nation was founded upon and to secure one of our most sacred rights as citizens. If we don’t have honest elections, we no longer live in a free country. Dictators like Stalin remained in power for a significant amount of time due to corrupt elections, a similar occurrence is a real possibility in the United States. Knowing the truth about the 2020 General Election is vital to this Country’s survival and in time I believe the truth will ultimately come out. The elimination of electronic voting machines and the utilization of paper ballots is the key to restoring confidence in our election system and is the only way to truly safeguard elections in the future.
I will be writing an article summarizing the Arizona Audit Report and it’s findings, as well as Constitutional and Judicial precedents for State Legislatures to recall their electors.