Pandemic or Plandemic?
Over the last two years, many questions about the Covid-19 pandemic remain unanswered but several uncanny connections and coincidences seem to suggest there is more to this situation than initially led on. Several pandemic exercises and simulations over the last few years have “war gamed” various pandemic scenarios. These exercises have been conducted by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and suggest that the Covid-19 pandemic was premeditated to some degree. These exercises and simulations include: Operation Lock Step, Clade X, Event 201 and SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028. Oddly enough, all of these exercises are fixated around a influenza-like coronavirus pandemic outbreak. I’m going to primarily focus on Operation Lock Step and Event 201 because these exercises best illustrate the events that have unfolded over the past two years. I’ll touch briefly on the other pandemic exercises Clade X and the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028.
The purpose of this article is to highlight how the pandemic has been leveraged towards a complete decrease in personal freedoms and uniform increase in control over the population. Regardless of your opinion on the Covid-19 pandemic, the information provided cannot be ignored and should provoke individuals to question everything that has occurred over the last two years. This article should further prove that the Covid-19 pandemic has never been about one’s health.
Your compliance is why this has been a never ending nightmare. Start resisting, otherwise the world your children and grandchildren inherit will be one where personal freedoms and liberties are merely a fragment of history.
The Rockefeller Foundation: Operation Lock Step
In 2010, The Rockefeller Foundation published a report titled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, in conjunction with futurologist Peter Schwartz and the Global Business Network. The report consisted of four different futuristic scenarios: Lock Step, Hack Attack, Clever Together and Smart Scramble. The scenario this section will highlight is the Lock Step scenario, which featured tighter government control and more authoritarian leadership, as well as highlighted the anticipated citizen pushback. The Lock Step scenario accurately describes the actions of governments on a global scale that have unfolded over the last two years.
The Rockefeller Foundation believes that in order to understand the many ways in which technology will impact international development in the future, we must first broaden and deepen our individual and collective understanding of the range of possibilities.
LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.
Operation Lock Step: How It Began
Operation Lock Step was a scenario that simulated a global pandemic caused by a coronavirus, which led to global lockdowns and increased government overreach through imposed restrictions under the guise of “health”. Interestingly enough, the restrictions included forced quarantine, mandatory face masks and temperature checks. It’s also mentioned that at first the population accepted the restrictions and rules but as time went on and authoritarian control persisted, a portion of the population began to pushback against the tyrannical rule. This pushback led to tighter restrictions and increased governmental oversight as those in power sought to maintain this level of control that is needed to further their agenda. As part of these tighter restrictions, developed countries implemented a form of biometric digital identification to further oversee and monitor citizen movement, health status and overall surveillance. Sound familiar?
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly.
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit.
The simulated pandemic and imposed restrictions resulted in technological advancements that further enhanced the government’s power and control over the global population. This new technology included: scanners that monitor abnormal societal behavior, new diagnostic tools for health care screening and government controlled internet networks to control the flow of information. If you know and understand world history, those that control the flow of information have historically been the bad guys and the civilian population typically suffers significantly as a result. In this scenario, world leaders prepared for civilian pushback through the implementation of these technological advancements and in turn, created mass surveillance states. This new technology led to the complete eradication of privacy and virtually eliminated all personal freedoms. Similar measures are being implemented around the world today and leaders across the globe are slowly moving towards the eradication of privacy and complete elimination of personal freedoms.
Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases.
Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
Operation Lock Step helps illustrate the draconian and unscientific measures imposed on citizens in response to the Covid-19 outbreak and how society as a whole has been altered. This exercise explains how citizens would willingly relinquish their individual freedoms under the guise of “public health” if convinced there was no other viable option. The connections and coincidences between this exercise and the events that have unfolded as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic should make rational individuals begin to question the current pandemic in it’s entirety. Operation Lock Step was conducted to identify potential issues that may arise in the attempt to fully take control over large populations and that’s where the Covid-19 mitigation measures came into play. The mitigation measures were introduced as a method of control, they were never for your health.
Event 201:
On October 18th, 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum hosted a high-level pandemic exercise, Event 201. The purpose of the event was to highlight areas in in the public/private sector that will be necessary in response to a severe pandemic, in order to mitigate societal and economic fallout. The event simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs and finally humans. Sound familiar? The pathogen used in the simulation was modeled after SARS, but the pathogen is more transmissible in community settings by people with mild symptoms. Remember the “asymptomatic” spread hysteria? The event outlined various topics such as: CAPS: The Pathogen and Clinical Syndrome, communication in a pandemic, finance in a pandemic and medical countermeasures.
Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
CAPS: Coronavirus Acute Pulmonary Syndrome
The pathogen used in the simulation, Coronavirus Acute Pulmonary Syndrome (CAPS), is an acute respiratory infection which can lead to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome and is caused by a swine-origin coronavirus. The virus originated in bats then mutated to successfully transmit to pigs and another mutation allowed transmission to humans. Oddly similar to the Covid-19 origin story that the mainstream media continues to suggest is accurate.
The FICTIONAL Coronavirus Acute Pulmonary Syndrome (CAPS) is an acute respiratory infection that can progress to pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. It is caused by a swine-origin coronavirus (CAPS virus).
The CAPS virus is from the same family of viruses as SARS and MERS but is antigenically distinct. The virus has existed in the fruit bat population for many years and has been transmitted to domestic pigs. The virus causes mild disease in pigs.
The CAPS virus is more transmissible in mild cases than SARS-CoV, and spread by mildly symptomatic individuals is possible. Transmission is via the respiratory route, mostly by respiratory droplets, with some proportion being airborne during aerosol-generating medical procedures.
Medical Countermeasures for CAPS:
In the medical countermeasures portion of Event 201, the use of an antiviral drug as a treatment for CAPS is discussed. The antiviral specifically discussed is a generic drug manufactured in multiple countries, which is used for the treatment of HIV in millions of individuals on a daily basis and is described to be an effective prophylactic. For some perspective, Ivermectin is a generic drug manufactured in multiple countries, which is primarily used for various types of ringworms and studies show Ivermectin is an effective prophylactic against Covid-19.
Extranavir is currently used to treat HIV but has been shown to be an effective treatment for CAPS. Extranavir may be an effective prophylactic if given throughout a period of possible exposure to the virus.
Extranavir is a generic drug that is manufactured in 5 countries, including the US and China. About 1 million people per day take Extranavir to treat HIV.
The next form of treatment discussed is a vaccine to combat the spread of CAPS, but states that no vaccine is licensed nor available for use against any coronavirus. The vaccine production timeline is highlighted and provides the assumption that it will take years to develop an effective vaccine, thus the use of a vaccine to control the CAPS pandemic is unlikely. The vaccine production timeline for Covid-19 vaccines was significantly expedited and any individual that questions the safety and efficacy is demonized and vilified. The use of a vaccine against a coronavirus was cautioned due to experiments that suggest vaccine induced immunity can be short lived and the risk of enhanced disease may result from said vaccine. Data from other countries show this occurrence to be true for the Covid-19 vaccine. The same individuals that claim the vaccine is “safe” and have made a major push for everyone to get vaccinated, all participated in the Event 201 simulation. These individuals acknowledged the risks of an expedited vaccine for a coronavirus and the increased possibility of enhanced disease due to short lived vaccine induced immunity in Event 201 but have intentionally disregarded these same risks in the Covid-19 pandemic. Do you get it yet?
There are no vaccines currently licensed and available for use against any coronavirus. Coronavirus vaccines for SARS and MERS have been technically challenging to develop and have not made it out of clinical trials.
Development of a vaccine against the CAPS virus will likely take years to achieve. The vaccine development process can take more than a decade. In pandemic situations, the timeline for vaccine development could possibly be shortened, but developing and manufacturing a vaccine against CAPS in time to control this pandemic is unlikely.
Some experiments have raised the possibility that immunity incurred from certain coronavirus vaccines can be short lived, and that enhanced disease may result from certain coronavirus vaccines.
Finance In A Pandemic:
The enforcement of draconian mitigation measures to combat the Covid-19 pandemic have been highly scrutinized due to the negative economic and societal consequences that have been a result of said mitigation measures. Any individual that suggests masks are effective a slowing the spread, lockdowns were beneficial and the forced closure of “non-essential” businesses was necessary to combat the Covid-19 pandemic, clearly have a distorted perception of reality.
The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. Efforts to prevent such consequences or respond to them as they unfold will require unprecedented levels of collaboration between governments, international organizations, and the private sector.
In addition to investing more in preparing their own companies and industries, business leaders and their shareholders should actively engage with governments and advocate for increased resources for pandemic preparedness.
Much of the economic harm resulting from a pandemic is likely to be due to counterproductive behavior of individuals, companies, and countries. For example, actions that lead to disruption of travel and trade or that change consumer behavior can greatly damage economies.
Communication In A Pandemic:
Throughout 2020-2021, emphasis on “misinformation” and “disinformation” has become increasingly prevalent and has resulted in mass censorship of those that question the narrative. Mainstream media outlets and social media companies have taken the steps to control the flow of information and to create a single “point of truth” for the definition of “news”. These efforts have conditioned individuals to believe a fictitious version of reality and has caused an extremely polarized society. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to objectively see how the media has manipulated public opinion based off false pretenses and blatant lies. I find it hard to wrap my head around the fact people are oblivious to the blatant propaganda.
Disinformation campaigns are widely recognized in the political world but have been identified in the public health realm as well. In the fall of 2018, a team of researchers systematically identified a concerted effort to spread disinformation and discord about vaccine safety.
National public health agencies should work in close collaboration with WHO to create the capability to rapidly develop and release consistent health messages. For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though the use of technology.
Social media platforms have attempted to change their algorithms to limit the spread of false information and promote correct information, but the problem of misinformation continues. Many misinformation response actions have been developed to be used against political misinformation and disinformation but may be applied in response to an epidemic.
Misinformation and disinformation are likely to be serious threats during a public health emergency. Unfortunately, thus far, there are limited ways to control the propagation of misinformation, leading to potentially draconian methods to manage this problem.
This “GNN” special report outlines the alleged threats of misinformation and disinformation that surrounds the CAPS pandemic. A solution to combatting these issues suggests controlling and reducing individuals access to information entirely. It’s also emphasized that political leaders themselves are culprits of misinformation and disinformation. Sound familiar?
The Event 201 exercise unequivocally foreshadows the events of Covid-19 pandemic and touches on all aspects that are currently happening today. The CAPS virus in this exercise originated from bats and was compared to SARS and MERS, conveniently SARS-CoV-2 was originally a bat coronavirus that had been genetically modified at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. One aspect of the Event 201 simulation that I find particularly interesting, is how ways to combat “misinformation” and “disinformation” in relation to a pandemic were severely emphasized. The same people that tell you what to think, what to do and what’s best for you, are the same individuals that war gamed pandemic scenarios and emphasized how to control the flow of information. Can you paint the picture yet?
Clade X:
In May of 2018, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security conducted an exercise that simulated a fast moving epidemic that tested the response and decisions of the President of the United States. The exercise focused on the outbreak of a parainfluenza virus that originated in Frankfurt, Germany and Caracas, Venezuela that quickly spread around the globe and tested the responses of global leaders. Ironically, the virus featured in the exercise, was initially unclear as to whether it was a natural occurrence or a genetically engineered mutation.
The goals of Clade X were to show the potential consequences of a pandemic, highlight the challenges it would pose, and produce policy solutions that could help prevent or change the outcomes. We intended to show how leaders in public health, politics, law, diplomacy, defense, home- land security, and intelligence all need to work together to solve some of the problems a pandemic will cause.
The Clade X storyline begins with concurrent outbreaks of a novel parainfluenza virus in Frankfurt, Germany, and Caracas, Venezuela. Initial evidence indicates that the virus is moderately contagious, principally through respiratory droplets. As it is unclear how this virus is related to other parainfluenza strains, scientists refer to it as ‘‘parainfluenza clade X.’’ It is soon revealed that the virus is in fact a Nipah/ parainfluenza hybrid, but it is initially unclear whether this is a natural occurrence or an intentional, genetically engineered mutation.
What I found interesting about the Clade X exercise is that is specifically includes a “two week” time parameter in reference to cases. “Two weeks to slow the spread..” Sound familiar?
SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028:
In March of 2020, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security conducted an exercise that focused on the facilitation of medical countermeasure communication in the event of a pandemic. The exercise was focused around a novel coronavirus that caused mild flu-like symptoms and the various communication dilemmas that could arise from a global pandemic. Interestingly enough, the exercise highlighted potential countermeasures to claims of vaccine adverse events, as more and more individuals became vaccinated across the United States. The vaccine injury section even mentions that individuals demanded that the federal government remove the pharmaceutical companies liability shields in order to file lawsuits in pursuit of financial damages from vaccine induced adverse events. Sound familiar?
After much consideration of possible emergency situations that would require MCM use, the project team decided on setting the storyline around a novel coronavirus that caused a mild, flu-like disease in most instances, but pneumonia and/or hypoxia requiring hospitalization and extensive medical treatment in a small minority of cases.
As time passed and more people across the United States were vaccinated, claims of adverse side effects began to emerge. Several parents claimed that their children were experiencing neurological symptoms similar to those seen among livestock exposed to the GMI vaccine.
That month, a group of parents whose children developed mental retardation as a result of encephalitis in the wake of Corovax vaccination sued the federal government, demanding removal of the liability shield protecting the pharmaceutical companies responsible for developing and manufacturing Corovax.
Aside from the exercise’s uncanny connection to what has happened over the last two years, the vaccine injury section included in the SPARS pandemic exercise is particularly intriguing. This suggests that the elites that run the world war gamed for the possibility of adverse events/injuries as a result of mass vaccination programs. The vaccine injury section emulates the current situation with the pharmaceutical companies that have produced the Covid vaccine. Impunity only lasts for so long.
Fauci: Fortune Teller or Mad Scientist?
On January 9th, 2017, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued a recommendation for new policy guidance: Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight. This policy recommendation led to the moratorium on gain of function research being lifted. Keep in mind, this was days before Trump was sworn into office.
On January 11th, 2017, just two days later at a pandemic preparedness forum at Georgetown University, Anthony Fauci stated:
‘No Doubt’ Donald J. Trump will be confronted with a surprise infectious disease outbreak during his presidency.
These statements weren’t random and definitely had meaning behind them. If only people knew a fraction of Fauci’s medical history…
Fauci & NIH Funded Gain of Function Research in Wuhan:
What is Gain of Function Research?
“Gain-of-function” is the euphemism for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses. GoF research is government funded; its focus is on enhancing the pathogens’ ability to infect different species and to increase their deadly impact as airborne pathogens and viruses. Ostensibly, GoF research is conducted for biodefense purposes. These experiments, however, are extremely dangerous. Those deadly science-enhanced pathogens can, and do escape into the community where they infect and kill people. What’s more, this line of research can be used for biological warfare.
Fauci Denies Funding Gain of Function Research:
Throughout various Congressional hearings in 2021, questions about gain of function research and the Wuhan Institute of Virology have been at the forefront of the conversation. During a Congressional hearing in May, Senator Rand Paul questioned Fauci about the NIH funding gain of function research in Wuhan, but Fauci adamantly stated that the NIH did not fund gain of function research. During a second Congressional hearing in July, Senator Paul accused Fauci of lying under oath about the U.S. funding gain of function research in Wuhan, but again Fauci repeatedly denied funding gain of function research.
NIH Admits Funding Gain of Function Research in Wuhan:
On October 20th, 2021, NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak, sent a letter to House Representative James Comer, that admitted the NIH awarded grant funds to EcoHealth Alliance for a project titled Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence. Tabak stated the research plan from EcoHealth Alliance was approved and did not require additional review because at the time the plan didn’t fit the definition research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential. The letter to Rep. Comer proves that the NIH funded gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that Fauci lied under oath in multiple Congressional hearings.
The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model. All other aspects of the mice, including the immune system, remained unchanged. In this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV 1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus.
The research plan was reviewed by NIH in advance of funding, and NIH determined that it did not to fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP) because these bat coronaviruses had not been shown to infect humans.
NIH Grant Details:
The total of the grant awarded was $3.1 million over a five year time period that spanned from 2014-2019. The grant to EcoHealth allocated $599,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, specifically for bat coronavirus research.
That grant proposal detailed in the trove of documents was for a project titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” which involved screening thousands of bat samples, as well as people who worked with live animals, for novel coronaviruses.
The $3.1 million grant was awarded for a five-year period between 2014 and 2019. After the funding was renewed in 2019, it was suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020.
The grant directed $599,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research.
Fauci and the NIH awarded the Wuhan Institute of Virology grants that were used specifically for bat coronavirus research. The gain of function research from the grants, explored genetic modifications of coronaviruses and resulted in the alteration of various strains not normally transmissible to humans, to then become transmissible in humans. Therefore Fauci, the main figurehead of the Covid-19 pandemic, touted as the patron saint, bears responsibility for funding the research that resulted in the creation and outbreak of SARS-CoV-2.
Origins of Covid-19:
In August of 2021, the House Foreign Affairs Republicans released an 84-page report that concluded SARS-CoV-2 originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The report is an overview of the intelligence information that indicates the lab leak theory is, in fact, true. I’m not going to go into depth on this due to the length of the article as is but this information is vitally important to understanding how everything fits together.
It is the opinion of Committee Minority Staff, based on the preponderance of available information; the documented efforts to obfuscate, hide, and destroy evidence; and the lack of physical evidence to the contrary; that SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released from a Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory sometime prior to September 12, 2019.
According to this report and various other sources, the World Military Games in September of 2019 is the event in which caused the virus to spread all over the world. September of 2019. Yes, we lived with Covid-19 for five months prior to lockdowns. This fact is going to be difficult for people to fully wrap their head around but it’s reality and a vast majority of individuals need to come back to reality.
On January 10th, 2022, Project Veritas released an exposé on Anthony Fauci and further exposed his continued lies and fallacies that surround the pandemic. This exposé is well worth your time and the documents included in the video are from the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA). The military intelligence documents included in the exposé by Project Veritas indicate that SARS-CoV-2 was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloriquine were both identified as curative in April of 2020 which means they are effective treatments for Covid and that the gene-encoded “mRNA” vaccines work poorly. In other words, military intelligence documents proves “conspiracy theorists” right again, which has become a reoccurring theme.
Have you figured it out yet?
The information I provided in this article should provoke individuals to at least begin to question what the hell is really going on. My opinion on the Covid-19 pandemic has remained the same since it was first announced that lockdowns were being instituted in the United States and I’m of the opinion that none of this has ever added up. Lockdowns, illogical mitigation measures such as masking and distancing, essential vs non-essential workers, vaccine mandates and so on. None of it has ever added up. It’s honestly alarming more people didn’t question lockdowns from the very beginning but I digress.
The purpose of this article is to hopefully wake some people up to what’s going on around them. These pandemic exercise simulations directly correlate with the events that have unfolded over the last two years, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to recognize this. I have been adamant about not willfully trusting the individuals that are telling YOU what’s best for YOU and my notion remains the same; start thinking for yourself and doing your own research. One would be amazed at how many lies can be pointed out in a daily main stream media news cycle. All of this ends when we the people say it does. Your compliance is the sole reason this has been a prolonged nightmare. Time is running out.
The more you begin to pay attention, the more you begin to realize that the vast majority of events throughout history haven’t happened by accident.