Media Deception: Volume 2
Psychological Conditioning Through Coordinated Disinformation Campaigns
Introduction:
In Volume 1 of this series, I provided the framework and perspective behind what the media has perpetrated on to the general public, as well as insight into everything going on in our Country. In Volume 2 of this series, I highlight how the mainstream media and establishment politicians psychologically conditioned individuals to believe the election was the safest and most secure through coordinated disinformation campaigns in the months that led up to the election. This article further provides perspective into the mainstream media’s intentional deception and how everything directly ties into the 2020 election. I encourage those to take the framework and perspective provided in Volume 1 and apply those concepts to this article. With each article in this series, I plan to expand on the framework of Color Revolutions and show how all of this is connected to the 2020 election. This article will illustrate the importance of the statement: Follow the money, it’s the key. The purpose of this series is to highlight the political propaganda, deception, lies, social conditioning, programming and manipulation, perpetrated onto the public by big tech and the mainstream media.
The premise behind this article is to illustrate how everything is connected and highlight the coordinated effort to control the narrative and manipulate public opinion. This article highlights specific measures that were taken by various organizations to condition the public to believe that Trump had no chance of winning the election and that the election would be the safest and most secure prior to the election even happening. Conveniently, the organizations included in this article all have connections to the Open Society Foundations and George Soros, who is the most well known architect of Color Revolutions.
If you have not read Volume 1 of this series, I suggest doing so:
The world is not sliding, but galloping into a new transnational dystopia. This development has not been properly recognized outside of national security circles. It has been hidden by secrecy, complexity and scale. The internet, our greatest tool of emancipation, has been transformed into the most dangerous facilitator of totalitarianism we have ever seen. The internet is a threat to human civilization. - Julian Assange
Premeditated Psychological Conditioning of The 2020 Election Outcome:
The 2020 Presidential Election will go down as the most polarizing, divisive and corrupt election in American history. The events that unfolded prior to the election helped falsely shape public opinion through coordinated mainstream media disinformation campaigns. These disinformation campaigns psychologically conditioned the general public to inherently believe that Trump was an authoritarian dictator, he and his supporters were white supremacist extremists, he would undermine the election process and allegedly had no possibility of winning the election. It’s mind numbingly frustrating to see individuals buy into the mainstream media propaganda, especially when they made Biden out to be the patron saint.
Transition Integrity Project:
On August 3rd, 2020, the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) released a report that highlighted various election outcomes and scenario risks, as well as ways to mitigate these risks. This group of over 100 current and former senior government and campaign leaders conducted a series of crisis scenario exercises in order to plan for the results of the 2020 election. The findings from this report helped initiate the psychological conditioning campaigns from the mainstream media through introducing the idea that Trump would undermine the election process, that the election would be contested and that the concept of “election night” is no longer accurate, to name a few. The mainstream media and establishment elite telegraph their game plan by planting a “seed” into the public’s conscience, which in turn conditions individuals to subconsciously believe anything stated about the given topic that coincides with the narrative of the “seed.” An inconspicuous way to cover one’s tracks in advance and maintain more control over the given narrative.
About TIP:
However, the administration of President Donald Trump has steadily undermined core norms of democracy and the rule of law and embraced numerous corrupt and authoritarian practices. This presents a profound challenge for those – from either party – who are committed to ensuring free and fair elections, peaceful transitions of power, and stable administrative continuity in the United States.
However, because the primary threat to the integrity of the election and transition appears to come from the Trump Administration, most of the recommendations in this memo focus on how actors committed to the rule of law can restrain or counter anti-democratic actions the Trump Administration and its supporters may take in connection with the 2020 election.
Executive Summary & Scenario Risks:
We also assess that the President Trump is likely to contest the result by both legal and extra-legal means, in an attempt to hold onto power. Recent events, including the President’s own unwillingness to commit to abiding by the results of the election, the Attorney General’s embrace of the President’s groundless electoral fraud claims, and the unprecedented deployment of federal agents to put down leftwing protests, underscore the extreme lengths to which President Trump may be willing to go in order to stay in office.
Risk Mitigation:
The purpose of this report is not to frighten, but to spur all stakeholders to action. Our legal rules and political norms don’t work unless people are prepared to defend them and to speak out when others violate them. It is incumbent upon elected officials, civil society leaders, and the press to challenge authoritarian actions in the courts, in the media, and in the streets through peaceful protest.
Narrative Control:
Second, the exercises were not able to fully capture the ways in which the media will shape and drive public opinion, or how specific media outlets would cover events differently and drive increasingly partisan responses. Social media in particular will undoubtedly play a heavy role in how the public perceives the outcome of the election.
During the exercises, winning “the narrative” emerged as a potentially decisive factor. Either side can expand or contract the “margin of contestation” if they succeed in substantially changing how key decision makers and the public view the “facts,” the risks of action or inaction, or external events such as civil unrest.
The Transition Integrity Project unequivocally “war gamed” the 2020 election to ensure that necessary safeguards would be in place and ready, for any potential outcome. These people planned for a contested election, focused on readiness in states and emphasized local election officials, addressed the fact that voter fraud claims would be evident and how the media needs to shape public perception through the anticipated rocky transition. All of these things literally came to fruition. The media conditioned the general public to believe that the concept of “election night” was no longer existent, in order to mitigate questions from the public after the announcement that the vote count had stopped for the night. The media conditioned individuals prior to the election to believe that any claim of voter fraud from the Trump Administration was a conspiracy theory. These individuals flat out admitted how the election would play out 3 months in advance, which allowed the media to begin their propaganda campaigns in order to indoctrinate the general public. TIP’s report provided framework for the media to begin their psychological disinformation campaigns to ultimately condition the public to believe anything said from the Trump campaign was a lie and to believe anything the mainstream media said to be true.
Transition Integrity Project & Color Revolutions?
The Transition Integrity Project, a “bipartisan” group, war gamed various election outcomes and scenarios, in order to coordinate and plan for whatever situation played out. Conveniently, all of the members of this group vehemently despise Trump. The interesting thing about the Transition Integrity Project is the uncanny connection to none other than, George Soros and Open Society Foundations. Keep in mind, Soros’ connection to various Color Revolutions that have taken place in overseas countries.
A Soros Linked Group: Transition Integrity Project
This follow-up report will focus specifically on how the “contested election scenario” we are hearing so much about plays into the Color Revolution framework — indeed, sowing doubt about the democratic legitimacy of the target and coupling it with calls for massive “mostly peaceful” demonstrations comes straight out of the Color Revolution playbook.
Rather than using a direct military intervention to effect regime change as in Iraq, Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press.
Mastermind Behind The Transition Integrity Project: Rosa Brooks
Of course, what they do not say about this ostensibly “bipartisan” group is that its founder, Rosa Brooks, is a long-time close associate of George Soros and his Open Society Foundation.
In 2006-2007, Brooks was Special Counsel to the President at the Open Society Institute in New York.
She currently serves on the advisory board of the Open Society Foundation’s US Programs, the advisory board of National Security Action and the board of the Harper’s Magazine Foundation.
George Soros & Open Society Foundations Key Roles in Color Revolutions:
George Soros and his Open Society Foundation have played key roles in the Color Revolutions in Eastern Europe, including the famous Orange Revolution and Euromaidan Revolution in the Ukraine, in which mass demonstrations and acts of civil disobedience were organized in order to overthrow the target regime helmed by Russia-aligned Yanukovich.
Rosa Brooks, the founder of the Transition Integrity Project, currently serves on the advisory board of the Open Society Foundation’s U.S. Programs and was Special Counsel to the President at the Open Society Institute in New York during the years 2006-2007. Brooks is also a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Fragile States. I won’t touch on her involvement with the World Economic Forum but it is rather convenient considering the WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda. George Soros founded the International Renaissance Foundation in 1990 and the organization is committed to the cultural transformation to an alleged “golden age.” Soros and the Open Society Foundations are most notably known for their involvement in both of the Ukrainian Color Revolutions, due to the aid provided to activists and protesters by the International Renaissance Foundation. These revolutions are conducted with the intention to destabilize a sovereign nation through the subversion of democracy.
Can you paint the picture yet?
‘Fortifying’ The Election: A Well-Funded Cabal
On February 4th, 2021, an article published in TIME, provided detailed insight into the shadow campaign that “saved the election.” The article highlighted a well coordinated effort by mainstream media, big business and political operatives to ensure Donald Trump wouldn’t win the 2020 election. This coordinated effort resulted in: State election laws were illegally changed, millions voted by mail for the first time, pressured social media and mainstream media companies to fight alleged disinformation, public awareness campaigns to inform the public understand the delay in vote count (TIP) and prevented “conspiracy theories” of Trump’s victory from being spread. This group of individuals formulated an extensive plan that touched every aspect of the election, which led to the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election. The level and depth that these individuals went to, to “thwart” Trump’s re-election is truly mind blowing. Mainstream media and establishment politicians claim that the 2020 election was the safest and most secure in history and label those that question the legitimacy of the election as conspiracy theorists, but the admissions from this article suggest otherwise. The media conditioned individuals into the belief that the election was legitimate, meanwhile boast about their efforts to subvert democracy.
Conspiracy Behind The Scenes:
There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day.
Coordinated Shadow Effort:
The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President.
*Make note of the name Norm Eisen and his quote.*
“The untold story of the election is the thousands of people of both parties who accomplished the triumph of American democracy at its very foundation,” says Norm Eisen
Well-Funded Cabal ‘Fortifying’ The Election:
Further into the article, an admission of a well-funded cabal that consisted of powerful people that worked behind the scenes to influence public perception, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information, to ensure the desired election result. It’s also claimed that they did not “rig” the election, they were merely “fortifying” it. Everything the media claims are conspiracies, are literally admitted to in this article. THEY ARE TELLING YOU THAT THEY STOLE THE ELECTION.
This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster.
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.
*Make note of Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy and his quote.*
“Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy
Trump’s ‘Lies and Conspiracy Theories’:
Bad actors spreading false information is nothing new. For decades, campaigns have grappled with everything from anonymous calls claiming the election has been rescheduled to fliers spreading nasty smears about candidates’ families. But Trump’s lies and conspiracy theories, the viral force of social media and the involvement of foreign meddlers made disinformation a broader, deeper threat to the 2020 vote.
The solution, she concluded, was to pressure platforms to enforce their rules, both by removing content or accounts that spread disinformation and by more aggressively policing it in the first place.
*Make note of Laura Quinn, co-founder of Catalist and her quote.*
“The platforms have policies against certain types of malign behavior, but they haven’t been enforcing them,” she says.
The first time I read this article, I was appalled by the blatant admission of the well coordinated effort that was extensively planned to subvert the 2020 election. These individuals think they are untouchable and admit to intentional election interference, meanwhile conservatives or anyone that questions the election are vilified and labeled a conspiracy theorist. This elaborate plan by the cabal consisted of big business coordination, the illegal acceptance of massive amounts of private funding, illegal (didn’t go through State Legislatures) alteration of election laws in 37 states and D.C. to expand mail in voting under the guise of Covid and manipulation of public perception through mainstream media disinformation campaigns. The excuse used to justify these actions by the well-funded cabal, was that they “saved the election” through “fortifying, not rigging” the election.
Norm Eisen: Color Revolution Architect
I mentioned to make note of Norm Eisen and his quote included in the TIME article. Norm Eisen, law school classmate of Obama, was responsible for drafting 10 articles of impeachment and handling the litigation of the Ukrainian impeachment hoax against Trump. Eisen, coincidentally wrote a book titled The Democracy Playbook, arguably a step by step Color Revolution manual, that highlights tactics used in countries overseas. Remember how TIP “war gamed” the 2020 election? Eisen participated in these electoral war games that prepared the shadow cabal to overturn a potential Trump electoral victory.
Important thing’s to make note of from these excerpts:
Eisen’s participation in the Ukrainian impeachment hoax, that he wrote The Democracy Playbook, Color Revolution’s are a specific type of coordinated attack and how Trump was a “populist” President.
The Democracy Playbook:
This playbook is organized into two principal sections: one dealing with actions that domestic actors can take within democracies, including retrenching ones, and the second section addressing the role of international actors in supporting and empowering pro-democracy actors on the ground.
The ability of political opposition and civil society to operate gives pro-democracy actors an urgent window of opportunity to push back on illiberal activity before it becomes further entrenched, and in turn, more difficult to undo.
As shown in Volume 1 of this series, Color Revolutions possess a 6-part framework (playbook), needed to overthrow a sovereign nation: Ideology, Finance, Social, Training, Information and Media. Eisen’s book includes a New Democracy Playbook section, let’s see how it compares to the framework of Color Revolutions.
Ideology: Incumbent political establishment & political opposition
Media: Civil society & independent media & social media enterprises
Social: Private enterprise & ordinary citizens
Finance: Partnering with domestic NGOs & providing foreign govt & institutional support
Training: Assisting civil resistance & nonviolent movements & providing foreign govt & institutional support
Information: Countering disinformation campaigns
By definition, the framework included in the New Democracy Playbook section directly coincides with the framework of Color Revolutions. It’s rather apparent that Norm Eisen played a major role in the coordination and execution of the 2020 election theft. Eisen served as the special counsel in the Ukrainian impeachment hoax and ironically the most notable Color Revolutions occurred in Ukraine. The Democracy Playbook highlights the urgency to eradicate “far-right populist parties” and Trump is considered a populist President. Color Revolutions are a specific type of coordinated attack and conveniently the items listed in the section A New Democracy Playbook of Eisen’s book, directly coincide with the framework of Color Revolutions. Starting to understand why I included Color Revolutions in Volume 1?
Laura Quinn: Catalist
As seen in the TIME article above, Laura Quinn played a role in the coordinated effort to subvert the 2020 election and notably mentioned that social media platforms need to enforce their guidelines, in regard to the alleged “misinformation” spread by Trump. Quinn, co-founder of Catalist, a progressive data collection and management firm that specifically focuses on providing election related data and trends to Democrats and progressives. Prior to the inception of Catalist, Quinn served as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Al Gore and in communications and economic policy positions for U.S. Senators Jay Rockefeller, Carl Levin, and Joe Biden. Catalist owns the largest election data trusts, which includes data on over 256 million unique voting-age individuals and provides target persuasive messaging to engage activists through an issue driven agenda.
Laura Quinn: Catalist
Catalist & Partners:
Another interesting aspect about Quinn and Catalist’s involvement in the shadow campaign to “save the election,” is Catalist’s group of partners. Keep in mind the connection between Politifact and Democracy Fund, and how Democracy Fund’s partners have a direct connection to George Soros and Open Society Foundations.
Catalist: Connection to Open Society Foundations & Soros
Open Society Foundations awarded over $5.9 million to Planned Parenthood between the years 2018-2020 and also awarded America Votes over $10.5 million between the years 2017-2020.
Laura Quinn, co-founder of Catalist, was quoted in the article that illustrated how a well-funded cabal coordinated to “save the election.” Quinn, prior to the founding of Catalist, worked for Joe Biden while he was a Senator and specifically dealt with communications. Catalist owns the largest data election data trusts and solely works with Democrats and progressives and has partners that have direct financial ties to Open Society Foundations and George Soros.
Ian Bassin: Protect Democracy
Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, also played a definitive role in the coordinated effort to subvert the 2020 election and stated that every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome (according to this cabal) was defeated by the work of this shadow campaign. Prior to the inception of Protect Democracy in 2017 (convenient timing), Bassin served as Associate White House Counsel and senior White House staff on administrative and constitutional law for the Obama Administration. Protect Democracy is a non-profit organization that claims to fight “threats to our democracy” through the filing of lawsuits in relation to Constitutional law and what they consider is a threat to democracy. The organization has published articles that highlight the alleged “threats to democracy” and also published a series of Democracy Blueprints, in which they lay out the framework to “restore democracy.” Sound familiar?
Ian Bassin: Protect Democracy
Protect Democracy: Connection to Open Society Foundations & Soros
Another interesting aspect of Protect Democracy, is that Open Society Foundations awarded them over $1.4 million between the years 2017-2020. Shocking, I know.
Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, was quoted in the article that illustrated a well-funded cabal that coordinated to “save the election.” Bassin, prior to the founding of Protect Democracy, worked in the Obama Administration and specifically dealt with Constitutional law and litigation. Protect Democracy is a non-profit organization that focuses on lawsuits involving Constitutional law and what they consider to be “threats to our democracy.” Protect Democracy is another organization involved in the “fortification” of the election, that also has direct financial ties to Open Society Foundations and George Soros. Interesting right?
It’s quite fascinating to see that Politifact, Democracy Fund, Catalist, and Protect Democracy all have ties to Open Society Foundations and George Soros. I find it particularly interesting that the co-founder of Catalist worked under Joe Biden and the co-founder of Protect Democracy served in the Obama Administration. Meanwhile Norm Eisen, Obama’s former law school classmate also served in the Obama Administration and authored the book The Democracy Playbook, which outlines the framework of Color Revolutions. Three individuals that had direct quotes in the TIME article that mentioned that a well-funded cabal “fortified” the election, all have prior experience with either Joe Biden or the Obama Administration. Coincidence?
But wait, I’m not done yet!
The Center for Tech & Civic Life: All Roads Lead Back to Democracy Fund & Soros
The Center for Tech and Civic Life is an organization that focuses on providing adequate training and technological resources for local election officials. CTCL is a team of civic technologists, trainers, researchers, election administration and data experts that aim to modernize elections through equipping election officials with technological resources. The organization hosts conferences for election officials and left leaning policy activists and equips them with training and resources at these conferences. CTCL is also one of the largest ballot data suppliers for the big tech companies, Google and Facebook. This organization’s involvement also played a definitive role in the shadow campaigns efforts to “fortify” the election through the dispersement of money to local election administrations from funds raised through public and private funding. Remember the organization Democracy Fund, the main contributing donor for Politifact?
CTCL: Connection to Democracy Fund
The organization pushes for left-of-center voting policies and election administration. It has a wide reach into local elections offices across the nation and is funded by many left-of-center funding organizations such as the Skoll Foundation, the Democracy Fund, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
The organization boasts that more than 250 million voters have accessed its data and that CTCL acts as a major supplier of ballot data for tech giants Facebook and Google.
The Center for Tech and Civic Life also hosts an annual conference for election officials and left-of-center election policy activists. Left-leaning advocacy organizations represented at the CTCL’s 2019 conference included the Democracy Fund, “e.thePeople” (part of the League of Women Voters), Metric Geometry & Gerrymandering Group, We Vote, MapLight, Democracy Works, and the National Institute on Money in Politics.
CTCL: Connection to Open Society Foundations & Soros
Conveniently, CTCL has partnerships with Democracy Fund and the Knight Foundation. In Volume 1 of this series, I wrote an in depth section about the “fact-checking” outlet Politifact and their largest financial donor, Democracy Fund. Politifact has also received funding from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Democracy Fund has direct financial ties to George Soros and Open Society Foundations through their partnership with NetGain.
CTCL Board of Directors: Tammy Patrick & Cristina Sinclaire
The Center for Tech and Civic Life’s connection to these other organizations is best explained through two members on their Board of Directors, Tammy Patrick and Cristina Sinclaire.
Additionally, a few members of CTCL’s board of directors have strong ties to Democratic political operations, notably Tammy Patrick, a senior advisor to the elections program at Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund, and Cristina Sinclaire, who was previously employed by NOI as well as by the progressive data service Catalist.
Tammy Patrick, on the Board of Directors at CTCL, is the current Senior Advisor to the Elections Programs at Democracy Fund. In 2013, Patrick served as a Commissioner on the Presidential Commission on Election Administration, which was established through an Executive Order issued by Obama. Prior to these positions, Patrick was a Federal Compliance Officer for Maricopa County Elections Department. Oddly enough, Maricopa County is a county under major scrutiny for election fraud in the 2020 election and has been the most publicized contested county from the election. Coincidence?
Cristina Sinclaire, on the Board of Directors at CTCL, is the current Senior Vice President at Clarity Campaign Labs in Washington D.C. Prior to Sinclaire’s work at Clairty, she served as the Director of Client Services at Catalist. Remember Catalist from above, oddly convenient right?
CTCL & TIME Shadow Campaign:
If you recall the TIME article from above, it was mentioned that the work of the shadow campaign touched every aspect of the election.
Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding.
A large portion of the hundreds of millions secured through private funding came from Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, who donated over $350 million to the Center for Tech & Civic Life (CTCL), to be dispersed to numerous county and city election officials throughout the country.
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Center for Tech and Civic Life began to play an active part in the effort led by the Democracy Fund to normalize mail-in ballots in the 2020 general election.
Combatting Election Misinformation:
Prior to the 2020 election, CTCL hosted an online webinar titled Combatting Election Misinformation, which served as a resource for election officials to act as “reliable sources” of information, in reference to alleged “misinformation.”
On July 30, 2020, CTCL posted a webinar entitled “Combatting Election Misinformation” as a resource to help election officials be “reliable source[s] of information” to combat misinformation. It justified the need for election officials to combat misinformation citing Russian interference in the 2016 election, and claimed Donald Trump himself has been a source of disinformation.
The Center for Tech and Civic Life fits into the shadow campaign equation due to the massive amounts of money donated by Mark Zuckerberg and the distribution of the funds in an effort led by Democracy Fund. CTCL is funded in part by Democracy Fund and worked along side Democracy Fund in the effort to distribute funds for mail-in ballot initiatives and other election related resources. Democracy Fund has a direct connection to Open Society Foundations and George Soros, this connection ties CTCL and Soros together.
Starting to see how EVERYTHING is connected? Have you noticed that ALL of these groups have emphasized “combatting misinformation” and ways to mitigate the spread of said information? Have you noticed that ALL of these groups played a part in “fortifying” the election and all have connections that lead back to Open Society Foundations and George Soros? Have you realized that all of these groups also have direct connections to Joe Biden and the Obama Administration?
Final Points:
This article included a massive amount of information and the purpose of this article could have gotten lost in translation. The purpose of this article was to show how everything is connected through various organizations and foundations, all of which played a role in the coordinated effort to thwart the 2020 election. The organizations and foundations included, all have direct ties to the notorious George Soros and his Open Society Foundations.
The Transition Integrity Project, tied to George Soros and Open Society Foundations, war gamed election outcomes which provided the framework necessary for the mainstream media to psychologically condition and falsely shape public opinion through disinformation campaigns prior to the 2020 election. The TIME article provided detailed insight into a well-funded cabal’s shadow campaign to “save the election” and how this effort touched every aspect of the election, specifically how the media steered coverage and influenced pubic perception throughout the election. Individuals specifically mentioned in the TIME article that played a role in this shadow campaign are Norm Eisen author of The Democracy Playbook, Laura Quinn founder of Catalist and Ian Bassin founder of Protect Democracy. Both Catalist and Protect Democracy have financial partners with direct ties to George Soros and the Open Society Foundations. The Center for Tech and Civic Life, an organization that focuses on providing training and technological resources to local election officials, played a role in this shawdow campaign through the dispersement of funds from Mark Zuckerberg ($350+ million), in an effort led by Democracy Fund. Democracy Fund is the primary financial donor for Politifact and receives direct funding from George Soros and the Open Society Foundations. Months prior to the election, CTCL hosted a “Combatting Election Misinformation” webinar for election officials, which served as a resource for officials to act as a “reliable source” of information in regard to alleged “election misinformation.”
The information provided in this article highlights the extensively coordinated effort to subvert American Democracy and to thwart the 2020 election. The depth that these individuals went to, to prevent Trump from re-election, should peak one’s curiosity and prompt one to begin asking questions. Numerous foundations and organizations involved in this coordinated effort have direct financial ties to George Soros and the Open Society Foundations, which provides clarity behind the emphasis of Color Revolutions. I wrote this article to show how all of these organizations are connected and how these organizations have emphasized the importance of narrative control in reference to the 2020 election. The information provided also proves that the media and these organizations, psychologically conditioned the public with false perceptions about the election, in order to maintain control of the narrative and sway the election. I hope this article provoked one to question the true motives of mainstream media outlets and political elites. In Volume 3 of this series, I will provide multiple examples of how the media has directly manipulated the public’s perception about various events through a politically driven agenda.
Follow the money, it’s the key.